All posts28 August 2026

TradersVote is live — not another analytics tool. Real signals.

I've released TradersVote.com. Trading is drowning in analytics tools that hand you charts and let you drown in them. TradersVote takes the other side — real signals with set entry, stop and target, graded in public against what the market actually did.

I've released TradersVote.com.

Trading has no shortage of analytics tools. Screeners, dashboards, indicators, heatmaps — an entire industry built on handing you more data and letting the decision stay your problem. You can pay for ten of those tools and still sit there at the open with the only question that matters unanswered: what's the trade?

TradersVote takes the other side of that. No "here's a chart, good luck." Real signals: this instrument, this entry zone, this stop, this target. Something you can act on — and something that can be judged. Real signals = real value. That's the whole thesis.

What a real signal looks like

Every night an AI desk works through roughly 730 instruments — stocks, crypto, commodities, forex — and votes out signals. Every one has its levels set before it's published: entry zone, stop, target, risk/reward. Nowhere to hide afterwards.

The signals page on TradersVote — real signals with entry zone, stop and target

The signals page today: entries, stops, targets and how far each trade has come. The platform is in Swedish for now — more on that below.

Then the traders vote

A signal alone is an opinion with levels. The interesting part is what happens while price sits in the entry zone: traders vote for or against. When the zone is gone, so is the vote — it locks, and when the trade resolves at target or stop, every vote is graded against the outcome.

Vote right, it shows. Vote wrong, that shows too. The leaderboard isn't about who sounds confident — it's about who is actually right. Humans + AI, shared edge, one scoreboard.

The catch with real signals: they can be wrong in public

This is exactly why the industry prefers selling analytics. A dashboard is never wrong — it just shows you data. A signal with a stop and a target gets marked right or wrong, every single time. TradersVote leans into that: every finished signal is judged against its own levels, result in R, and the losers stay on the page next to the winners.

Completed signals on TradersVote — every trade graded in R, losses included

Completed signals, graded. The −1.00 R rows don't get deleted — that's the point.

Signal sellers who only show winners are the reason retail traders stop trusting anyone. The fix isn't better marketing. It's a public scoreboard you can't edit.

The data is there too — it's just not the product

There is a full market console under the hood: insider trades from both SEC's EDGAR and the Swedish FI registry, report dates, a macro calendar, crypto strength maps, real-time prices. All built on free data sources. But it exists to feed the signals, not to be admired. The data is the kitchen; the signal is the dish.

Swedish first, English soon

TradersVote is in Swedish today, and an English version opens in a few months. If you read Swedish — or don't mind your browser translating — you're welcome in right now. Otherwise: the scoreboard will still be public when the English doors open, losses and all.

One rule applies either way, and it's printed at the top of the signals page: do your own research before you follow a signal.